Economy Politics USA

From Truth Social to “Star Power”: What Trump Media’s Fusion Tie-Up Still Has to Prove

From Truth Social to “Star Power”: What Trump Media’s Fusion Tie-Up Still Has to Prove
Chris Delmas / AFP via Getty Images
  • Published December 20, 2025

Axios, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Reuters contributed to this report.

So, yeah — this is still the weirdest business pairing of the year: Trump Media, the Truth Social/crypto-adjacent company, trying to fuse its future with TAE Technologies, a long-running fusion startup that wants to turn “science project” into “power plant.”

And now the question is simple: after the headline pop and the political heat, what does the road ahead actually look like?

Fusion has been “ten years away” for, like, fifty years. But the pitch is getting louder because the world is staring down a brutal reality: AI data centers are vacuuming up electricity, and everyone is scrambling for new power sources that aren’t just “build more gas plants and pray.”

That’s where TAE comes in — and where Trump Media’s merger suddenly becomes more than a meme-stock plot twist. If this merger closes, it’ll be one of the first real tests of whether public markets have the patience (and the stomach) to fund fusion while it’s still pre-commercial, expensive, and loaded with technical risk.

Also: it’s a massive identity swap for Trump Media. The stock bounced hard on the news, but the company is still down about 56% this year. That’s not exactly “steady growth story.”

TAE’s timeline is… bold. The company hopes to start producing electricity by 2031, from a 50-megawatt reactor it wants to begin building next year, using financing unlocked by the merger.

To put that in perspective: 50 megawatts is meaningful, but it’s not a grid-changing monster. It’s more like a “prove it works at utility scale” beachhead. If it works, the argument is that bigger plants follow. If it doesn’t, the whole thing risks becoming a very public lesson in how unforgiving physics can be.

Here’s what’s been laid out so far:

  • TAE gets up to $200 million in cash at signing.
  • Another $100 million becomes available once the deal hits a formal SEC notification step.

For fusion companies, cash isn’t a nice-to-have — it’s oxygen. Fusion development is basically a long marathon of expensive experiments, hardware builds, and “not yet” milestones. So yes, that injection matters.

This isn’t just an energy story. It’s a politics-and-ethics story stapled to an energy story.

  • Donald Trump Jr. is slated to join the merged company’s board.
  • Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), who actually supports fusion and helped start the bipartisan House fusion caucus, publicly warned the deal raises “significant concerns” about conflicts of interest and potential corruption — especially with fusion getting public R&D support and federal policy potentially shaping who wins.

That’s the tightrope: TAE wants to be taken seriously as an energy company. But partnering with a Trump-linked public company guarantees the project will be viewed through a political lens — by regulators, lawmakers, investors, and probably the internet forever.

One of the most intriguing nuggets: a source familiar with the deal says the combined company plans to be solely energy-focused.

Translation: Truth Social and the rest of Trump Media’s grab-bag (streaming, crypto, whatever comes next) could be sold, spun off, or separated.

TAE CEO Michl Binderbauer didn’t confirm or deny that in the Axios interview, which is exactly the kind of non-answer that keeps the speculation alive.

If that separation happens, it would basically turn the merger into a reverse takeover where the fusion business becomes the “real” company — and the media stuff becomes baggage to unload.

Fusion companies live and die on the same boring question every power provider faces: Who’s paying for the electricity?

Binderbauer was asked whether TAE is talking to hyperscalers (think the big cloud/AI players) about power offtake deals. He pointed to TAE’s connections — including ties to Google — and said the company “knows the space,” but added he’s not ready to announce any deal.

That’s a big tell. Because if a fusion company can eventually say, “Here’s our buyer, here’s our contract,” the story changes fast. Until then, it’s still mostly promise.

TAE has been around a long time in startup years and has raised about $1.3 billion in private funding, with backers including Google, Chevron, Sumitomo, and NEA. Binderbauer also said TAE is generating revenue through spinoffs in power management and life sciences — and he didn’t rule out going after federal funding, especially if the company starts talking about multiple plants.

Before any of this becomes real, the merger still needs shareholder and regulatory approval. The companies say they’re aiming to close in mid-2026.

And after that? The market becomes the judge.

How the merged company trades over the coming months and years will tell everyone whether public investors are willing to fund fusion like they fund biotech: high risk, long timelines, brutal volatility — and the occasional breakthrough that makes it all look genius in hindsight.

For now, the deal is a fresh pile of capital, a loud spotlight, and a giant question mark shaped like a power plant.

Wyoming Star Staff

Wyoming Star publishes letters, opinions, and tips submissions as a public service. The content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Wyoming Star or its employees. Letters to the editor and tips can be submitted via email at our Contact Us section.